Help save Shirley'sPond -- pledge drive coming up

New life enrichment activity: plugging a computer into your Bose

TWW takes no responsibity if you mess up your electronic equipment but if you are interested try http://www.live365.com/new/index.live and listen for free

Since gay marriage is the media obsession for a day or two TWW thinks it is time to point out how the polyandry-phobes and the polygyny-phobes are just as narrow-minded and hateful as the homophobes. Men who want multiple wives or women who want multiple husbands cannot marry someone they want to marry just as in the gay marriage debates.  TWW says if two or more adults want to form a legal personal relationship union the law should not prevent them.  They pay to get married, have to live with their decisions and pay to get out of the contract. The only real drawback to allowing more than two people to be married to each other is it would mess up a lot of computer systems.  

How come 'they' have not rounded up the people in this video?

Belated pics of last storm of the century

Fair and balanced once again

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/16/charlie-blackmore-marine-veteran-draws-gun_n_2891176.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl8%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D284796#slide=1592790

Read the article above. It sounds somewhat objective but then look at the pictures at the bottom which talk about vigilantes. The good guy was a vigilante? TWW wonders if the female victim in the story wanted 'gun control' to take the gun away from the vigilante who may have saved her life.  

TWW's question for people with liberal values:  If you are about to become a crime victim would you want one of those people legally carrying a weapon to help you out (even if they are not legally required to do so) or should they just call 911 and go about their business? But if they do help you out will you still want to take their guns away?

Hopefully spring will come soon so TWW can find other topics to blab about.    

Uncle Tom of the Day

When will this guy realize only white-privileged liberal people can talk about this topic?  

The code of silence rules so ban the tools of the trade

"It’s getting easier to get away with shooting people in Chicago.

Last year, gunmen who shot and wounded someone got away without criminal charges 94 percent of the time, according to a DNAinfo.com Chicago analysis of police data.

That’s even worse than 2011, when 91.5 percent of shooters escaped charges, according to the data.

Chicago’s top cop said the “no-snitch” code of silence on the street is the biggest contributor in his department’s struggle to charge shooters."

Read more: http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20130124/chicago/most-shooters-chicago-dont-face-charges#ixzz2Nphkxaae

Penny wise and.....

Bill Mayers may be the new conservative hero

The key here is liberals are fine with other people paying taxes.

misquote of the day

“Scissors? That’s their answer?” LaPierre asked. “Let’s get this straight: To protect our children at school, we recommend a trained professional with a gun, and they recommend scissors? And they say we’re crazy? It’s sheer madness.”

see: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/343073/lapierre-let-them-be-damned-eliana-johnson

So who is morally superior?

The antiabortion people have their morality on their side and TWW bets most of them think they are morally superior to the other side but the same seems to apply to another situation too but this time it is liberal moral superiority. 

"Gun control efforts are largely a culture-war offensive by liberals who dislike the parts of America that own guns and love guns. This meddling motivation shines through in the rhetoric of gun control advocates and in the laws they push.

For many gun owners, the firearm is not merely a tool for the practical purpose of self-defense. Nor is it simply recreational equipment, like a golf club. It's a cultural signifier, and a totem of a worldview."

source: http://washingtonexaminer.com/tim-carney-liberals-use-gun-control-to-claim-cultural-superiority/article/2524236

Killing ____________ is OK (you fill in your own group)

For an example see what they are seeing in the buses in liberal San Fransisco: http://cbssanfran.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/killing-jews-muni-ad.jpg?w=300

Mrs TWW wants to kiss this frog

Mrs TWW does not know insanity is trying the same thing over and over while expecting a different result.

Footprints in the snow and slush

Hunting to people with liberal values - quote of the day

"We have federal regulations and state laws that prohibit hunting ducks with more than three rounds. And yet it’s legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines."  - Diane Feinstein
Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/03/sen-dianne-feinstein-says-its-legal-to-hunt-humans/#ixzz2N8upMYzZ

More of the same

The masonry stove speaks to Mrs TWW

Keep calm and hit her?

" 'Keep Calm' rape T-shirts taken off site

MP demands Amazon makes reparations for selling tops 'encouraging' sexual violence"

read http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/keep-calm-rape-tshirts-taken-off-site-8518001.html

"I am innocent; the computer did it" or so says the company.  

The real question here is whether the Republican War on Women was a computer error too. 

No snow pics today

Another storm of the century fizzles out.

TWW wants to make one of these

https://www.facebook.com/sneezingcow

Spring just around the corner until tomorrow when it blizards

Two eight foot logs turned into rough bowls

Due to sequestration there will be no post today

So BO's people came up with the evil BO is trying to protect us against?

In portraying the sequester as a Republican idea during a Presidential debate last year, President Obama misspoke. Woodward’s reporting makes clear that the idea originated from the White House’s budget negotiators, Jacob Lew (now the Treasury Secretary) and Rob Nabors. Desperate to avoid a failure to extend the debt ceiling, which could have led to a U.S. debt default, they designed the sequester as a “poison pill” that would kick the dispute down the road while providing an incentive for both sides to compromise.

Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2013/02/bob-woodward-throws-an-interception.html#ixzz2MIJfPPAo