A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fail to stand up to scrutiny.
source here: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/06/08/legal-beagle-says-manmade-global-warming-science-doesn’t-withstand-scrutiny/#more-20322He found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it “seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.”
No comments:
Post a Comment